Services
How I help B2B & SaaS leaders build and optimize predictable revenue
AI-Growth Revenue Architecture (Flagship Service)
An end-to-end, AI-enhanced revenue system designed to support both growth and optimization. Best for: B2B & SaaS companies that need scalable growth or structural correction — without rebuilding everything from scratch.
View Details
Revenue System Sprint (Strategy & Correction)
A focused engagement to diagnose revenue leakage, misalignment, and hidden inefficiencies across your go-to-market system. Best for: Leadership teams preparing for a strategic reset, efficiency push, or difficult growth decisions.
View Details
Ongoing Revenue Systems Advisory (Retainer)
Ongoing senior advisory support for leaders navigating complex growth or correction phases. Best for: Founders, CROs, and CMOs who want a senior partner during periods of scale, consolidation, or uncertainty.
View Details
Brand & Creative Direction (Strategic)
Ensuring brand and creative execution reinforce revenue efficiency — not just awareness. Best for: B2B & SaaS companies refining positioning, entering a new phase, or correcting messaging that no longer converts.
View Details
Case Studies
Revenue systems in practice. Designing clarity across marketing, sales, and leadership
Revenue Systems Architecture
Case 1 — B2B SaaS company within a multinational software portfolio From disconnected tools to an intelligent revenue system
Revenue System Sprint
Case 2 — Reducing CAC without freezing growth
Revenue System Sprint + Oversee
Case 3 — Leadership alignment Aligning marketing, sales, and executive decision-making
How I Work
From diagnosis to durable revenue systems
Who is this for?
I work primarily with B2B and SaaS companies operating in complex environments — typically with established marketing and sales teams, active pipelines, and growing decision complexity. If your challenge is not “doing more,” but understanding what actually drives revenue, this is likely a good fit.
Who is this not for?
This is not designed for: -Early-stage startups looking for hands-on execution of campaigns, ads, or content -Companies seeking campaign management or lead generation as a standalone service -Organizations expecting a consultant to replace an internal marketing team through direct execution My work assumes either: -existing marketing and sales execution capability, or -the need for senior oversight and system design where execution is handled by internal teams or trusted partners. In cases where an internal marketing team is not yet in place, I can act as a fractional Head of Marketing, providing strategic direction, system design, and ongoing oversight — while collaborating with experienced marketing, design, and content partners for execution.
Do you run campaigns or provide marketing execution?
No. I don’t run campaigns or provide hands-on marketing execution. I design the revenue system those activities operate within and, when needed, provide senior oversight to ensure execution aligns with the system. Execution itself is handled by internal teams or trusted marketing and design partners.
How is this different from RevOps or consulting?
Traditional RevOps often focuses on tools, reporting, or processes in isolation. My work focuses on how revenue actually flows end-to-end — across marketing, sales, data, and decision-making — and on designing a system that aligns all of them around shared outcomes. It’s architecture first, optimization second.
Is this only about growth?
No. I work across growth, optimization, and correction phases: scaling with control reducing CAC without freezing demand improving alignment during slowdowns or transitions Sometimes the goal is growth. Sometimes the goal is clarity and efficiency.
How does AI fit into your work?
AI is used as infrastructure, not as a feature. When appropriate, I design AI-enhanced revenue systems that: improve visibility across fragmented data support better qualification and follow-ups help leadership make decisions based on consistent context AI serves the system — not the other way around.
What does a first engagement usually look like?
Most engagements start with a Revenue System Sprint — a structured diagnosis of how your current revenue system works, where friction exists, and what to fix first. From there, we decide whether a full architecture or ongoing advisory support makes sense.
How do I know if this is worth a conversation?
A short conversation is usually useful if you feel that: -data exists, but decisions still feel unclear -marketing and sales are active, but not fully aligned -reporting doesn’t answer leadership-level questions In these cases, a structured discussion is often enough to assess whether a system-level approach makes sense. When this is likely not a fit This is probably not the right conversation if: -you’re looking for hands-on execution of campaigns, ads, or content -you need immediate lead generation rather than system clarity -there is no internal ownership of marketing or sales, and no intention to establish it My work assumes either existing execution capability or the need for senior oversight and system design, with execution handled by internal teams or trusted partners.